http://renaissance-adventures.com/scriptorium
buy cialis
17
Aug

Arundel: Plots, Perfidy and the odd Canonization.

   Posted by: Dame Sylvie La Fauconniere   in Keep of the Castle

The sheer magnificence of Arundel, photo by David Urrutia

The sheer magnificence of Arundel, photo by David Urrutia

Arundel Part 1

Part 3 of a series of articles on Arundel Castle

William D’Aubigny (also D’Albini) retained possession of Arundel Castle until his death when it reverted to the crown. Henry II (1154–1189) stayed at Arundel often and spent a prodigious amount of money on mainly domestic improvements, like a new range by the south bailey.

Henry II of England

Henry II of England

In 33 years, Henry II spent well over 20,000 pounds sterling on repairing and/or refashioning at least 90 castles in his realm in a massive defensive strategy that focused on building in stone. The plan also included dismantling primarily motte-and-bailey castles built in England without license in the previous twenty years.

The D’Albini family, clearly pining after the lost castle, regained it under Richard the Lion Hearted, paying more than one “fine” for the reinstatement.  Such “fines” were thinly veiled means by which Richard, the absentee Crusader king (who spent less than a year of his reign of ten years actually in England), could raise money for his Continental ventures.

The last D’Albini died in 1243, at which point the castle passed to John Fitzalan, who had married Hugh d’Albini’s daughter, Isobel. The Fitzalans held the castle until Mary Fitzalan married the fourth Duke of Norfolk in 1555.  This is how the the Fitzalans and the Howard family are joined (be ye descended from either or both, make note!).

The third Duke of Norfolk’s infamy lies primarily in his manipulations to marry his two nieces–first Anne Boleyn, then Katherine Howard–to Henry VIII. Both wives were eventually beheaded on charges of treasonous adultery that, at 220px-Thomas_Howard,_third_Duke_of_Norfolk_by_Hans_Holbein_the_Younger least in Anne’s case, were trumped up.  210px-Anne_boleyn

In 1572, Queen Elizabeth beheaded the fourth  Duke of Norfolk, who owned Arundel, for his  alleged involvement in the Ridolfi plot. In that  plot (which Norfolk at first resisted) papal agent  Ridolphi had embroidered upon earlier plans for  a marriage between Mary Stuart and Norfolk  aimed at restoring Mary to the Scottish throne  and persuading Elizabeth to recognize her as a  successor.

Ridolphi altered these plans so to  entail a full-scale Catholic invasion of England  that naturally included the overthrow of  Elizabeth. Mary Stuart and Norfolk would be the  new, Catholic regents.

While Thomas Howard,  Duke of Norfolk, was apparently reluctant to convert to Catholicism, his son, Philip Howard, proved a most devout Roman Catholic. In 1589, Philip led a public mass for the success of the Spanish Armada against his own countrymen, for which crime he was imprisoned in the Tower of London, where he died six years later from poisoning. (He was canonized by Rome as a saint in 1970.)

200px-PhilipEarlOfArundelInTheTower

James I restored Thomas, son of Philip Howard, as Earl of Arundel in 1604. Thomas built vaults under the Fitzalan Chapel and brought his father’s body from the Tower to be interred therein.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,

This entry was posted on Monday, August 17th, 2009 at 11:55 am and is filed under Keep of the Castle. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 comments so far

Petra deBlanc
 1 

This is a most informative article regarding this history of Arundel. I am curious as to how much 20, 000 pounds would convert to in value of today’s currency. I can only assume it’s an astronomical amount of money. While peasants barely subsisted…

August 18th, 2009 at 6:18 am
J F Broyles
 2 

My mother’s side of the family has traced family lineage back to the Dukes of Norfolk, so I’m especially interested in learning Arundel Castle. I want to visit there so very much.
I also would like to buy some flower seeds harvested from the gardens at Arundel Castle but can’t find them listed at their website. I think it would be great for Mom and I to be able to grow flowers from the seeds harvested from Arundel Castle.
Also, how is Arundel pronounced?

August 21st, 2009 at 5:04 am
Dame Sylvie La Fauconniere
 3 

Dear Petra,

After reading your comment, I consulted my two friends, Roger Frantz PHd and professor of economics at SDSU (and author of many weighty tomes on economics) and Nancy O’Barr, MA Econ. who happens to be Roger’s wife and inspiration to get up each morning. Here is their response:

“Dearest Dame Sylvie, There are many ways to calculate it but the conversion tables only go to the year 1264. £20,000 in 1264 is worth anywhere from £10.5 Million (using retail prices to calculate) to £237 Million (using average earnings to calculate). The current exchange rate as of Aug 5, 2009 is £1.00 = $1.70 but this changes daily. In April it was $1.40.
So the answer today is somewhere between $17.85 Million and $402 Million and remember that only goes back to 1264.

If you want to emphasis how much he paid for the bridge use the retail price method. (£17.85 Million)

The average wage method shows purchasing power parody does not really mean much over this much time. “

August 23rd, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Dame Sylvie La Fauconniere
 4 

Dear J F Broyles,

On your behalf, we have made an inquiry at Arundel Castle to discover whether the head gardener would be willing to sell you some flower seeds. Please be patient. He is more often in the garden than dipping his plume into the ink pot. We shall let you know as soon as we do. A tout a l’heure.

August 23rd, 2009 at 5:28 pm
targeted follow